Publication year:
2018
English
Format:
(636.5 KiB)
Publisher:
JILP, UC Davis Journal of International Law and Policy
This article discusses the legal dilemma of minors involved in terrorist acts and related offenses in the Islamic State ranks. The article provides a detailed analysis of the consistency and inconsistency between the rule of law provisions related to minors in combat and counter-terrorism practices. It examines the extent to which existing legislative gaps expose minors to a system of human rights abuses. The lack of monitoring on counter-terrorism activities in conjunction with an excessive deference to the executive in Syria and the United States supports the emergence of a climate of impunity for actions committed by state officials in counter-terrorism operations. The security imperative to combat terrorism ultimately causes the derogation of rule of law and influences the performance of the criminal justice system. This article illustrates how the failure to address terrorism and terrorism-related offenses at the international level provides for nation-states to issue anti-terrorism treaties which disrupt principles of juvenile justice,as they focus on inflicting punishment and do not envisage rehabilitation and reintegration.
Read full abstract
Authors
Content type
Country
Region
Rights
© Author/Publisher
If you have noticed a document assigned to the wrong author or any other inaccuracies, let us know! Your feedback helps us keep our data accurate and useful for everyone.
Share
Link