Case Studies and Success Stories, Reports, Studies, Reviews and Research

 Cash or In-Kind? Why Not Both? Response analysis lessons from multimodal programming

small calendar icon

Publication year:


small globe icon


small file information icon


(3.2 MiB)

small number of pages icon


CaLP, The Cash Learning Partnership,CRS, Catholic Relief Services,Samaritan's Purse,TOPS Small Grant,USAID, US Agency for International Development

This research reviews lessons learned about response analysis from multimodal responses, that is, responses in which practitioners determined that more than one response modality between cash, vouchers, and in-kind, was a “best fit” or in which the conclusions about “best fit” changed over the course of the project. The research hypothesizes that comparing the reasons for choosing different types of response within the same project and among the same beneficiaries should provide concrete examples of the relative importance of different criteria in response and, by extension, the conditions under which cash or vouchers or in-kind assistance may be most appropriate.

This work does not aim to inform technical or operational considerations of how to do cash transfers or multimodal programming. Rather, this work is intended to help analysts, advisors, and decision-makers develop and articulate the nexus between emergency context and response through concrete examples of response analysis, both at project design and throughout a response. 

SubscribeSubscribe and receive reading selections

LibrarySave all your favorite materials for future use

UploadUpload research & contribute to the collection

By browsing the Resource Centre you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Read our cookie policy.